I agree with you, that this is not nearly fast enough.
However, this is 10 times faster then our original results, where we
were searching 100 emails in about the same amount of time. With
production code, some more optimization, esp. client side
optimizations (i.e. message caching when
On 2008-06-02, Adam Aviv wrote:
I recently implemented SSARES directly in python and also added
parallelism to the searching. We can now search the a large inbox
(1000+) messages in about 2-4 minutes.
Not to rain on your parade, but 1,000 messages is *not* a large inbox
and 2 to 4 minutes is
Greg Black wrote:
On 2008-06-02, Adam Aviv wrote:
I recently implemented SSARES directly in python and also added
parallelism to the searching. We can now search the a large inbox
(1000+) messages in about 2-4 minutes.
Not to rain on your parade, but 1,000 messages is *not* a large inbox
and
[Moderator's note: Please don't top post. --Perry]
Depending on the level of protection you want, you could just add a
script to your .forward to encrypt your email before delivery using
PGP/GPG. However, this will leave the headers in the clear, so you
will likely want to create an entirely new
I recently implemented SSARES directly in python and also added
parallelism to the searching. We can now search the a large inbox
(1000+) messages in about 2-4 minutes. Technically, this could be done
on a large scale and be practical, since my implementation is not
fully optimized nor free of
