snipped
|
| Talking about users as being able only to hold one bit continues an
| unfortunate attitude that, if only users weren't so dumb/careless/whatever,
| we wouldn't have all these security problems.
|
| This is an important point.
In November, 2003, the Computing Research
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you write:
http://www.informationweek.com/story/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=171200010
Summary: some phishes are going to SSL-secured sites that offer up
their own self-signed cert. Users see the warning and say I've seen
that dialog box before, no problem, and
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Jerrold Leichter writes:
Talking about users as being able only to hold one bit continues an
unfortunate attitude that, if only users weren't so dumb/careless/whatever, we
wouldn't have all these security problems.
This is an important point. When *many* people
On 9/25/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Paul Hoffman) wrote:
http://www.informationweek.com/story/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=171200010
Summary: some phishes are going to SSL-secured sites that offer up
their own self-signed cert. Users see the warning and say I've seen
that dialog box before, no
At 8:53 AM +0200 9/26/05, Amir Herzberg wrote:
Is PKI the cause of this? I think not. This is a usability problem.
We try to fix this problem (and similar problems) with TrustBar.
Indeed we even had incidents where people on the TrustBar team
itself, and some security experts using TrustBar,
