> " " == Eric Rescorla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tyler Close <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> On Thursday 02 October 2003 09:21, Jill Ramonsky wrote:
>> > I was thinking of doing a C++ implentation with classes and
>> > templates and stuff. (By contrast OpenSSL is a C
>> > implementation).
- Original Message -
From: "Tyler Close" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, October 04, 2003 4:31 AM
Subject: Choosing an implementation language
> On Thursday 02 October 2003 09:21, Jill Ramonsky wrote:
> > I was thinking of doing a C++ implentation with classes
Tyler Close <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thursday 02 October 2003 09:21, Jill Ramonsky wrote:
> > I was thinking of doing a C++ implentation with classes and
> > templates and stuff. (By contrast OpenSSL is a C
> > implementation). Anyone got any thoughts on that?
>
> Given the nature of rec
On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 04:31:26PM -0400, Tyler Close wrote:
> On Thursday 02 October 2003 09:21, Jill Ramonsky wrote:
> > I was thinking of doing a C++ implentation with classes and
> > templates and stuff. (By contrast OpenSSL is a C
> > implementation). Anyone got any thoughts on that?
>
> Giv
Ah, the joys of diversity. Implementations
of all your favorite protocols in all your
favorite programming languages by all your
favorite programmers in all your favorite
countries on all your favorite operating
systems for all your favorite chips.
Continuous debugging certainly is the path
to
