On 10/1/05, Jason Holt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The reason I have separate token and cert servers is that I want to end up
> with a client cert that can be used in unmodified browsers and servers. The
> certs don't have to have personal information in them, but with indirection we
> cheaply ge
On Sun, 2 Oct 2005, cyphrpunk wrote:
1. Limting token requests by IP doesn't work in today's internet. Most
Hopeless negativism. I limit by IP because that's what Wikipedia is already
doing. Sure, hashcash would be easy to add, and I looked into it just last
night. Of course, as several h
A few comments on the implementation details of
http://www.lunkwill.org/src/nym/:
1. Limting token requests by IP doesn't work in today's internet. Most
customers have dynamic IPs. Either they won't be able to get tokens,
because someone else has already gotten one using their temporary IP,
or the
On Sat, 1 Oct 2005, cyphrpunk wrote:
All these degrees of indirection look good on paper but are
problematic in practice.
As the great Ulysses said,
Pete, the personal rancor reflected in that remark I don't intend to dignify
with comment. However, I would like to address your attitude of
On 9/30/05, Jason Holt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://www.lunkwill.org/src/nym/
> ...
> My proposal for using this to enable tor users to play at Wikipedia is as
> follows:
>
> 1. Install a token server on a public IP. The token server can optionally be
> provided Wikipedia's blocked-IP list
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2005 02:18:43 + (UTC)
From: Jason Holt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: nym-0.2 released
nym-0.2 is now available at:
http://www.lunkwill.org/src/nym/
My tor server is currently down, so I can't set up a public tr
