Diebold Inc.

2003-09-13 Thread R. A. Hettinga
I wonder if there are any mirrors of this out there? Cheers, RAH --- begin forwarded text Status: U Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 18:36:13 -0700 From: Elias [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; WinNT4.0; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20021120 Netscape/7.01 To: Fork [EMAIL

Re: quantum hype

2003-09-13 Thread David Wagner
martin f krafft wrote: So MagiQ and others claim that the technology is theoretically unbreakable. How so? If I have 20 bytes of data to send, and someone reads the photon stream before the recipient, that someone will have access to the 20 bytes before the recipient can look at the 20 bytes,

Re: quantum hype

2003-09-13 Thread David Wagner
On 09/13/2003 05:06 PM, David Wagner wrote: Quantum cryptography *assumes* that you have an authentic, untamperable channel between sender and receiver. Not true. The signal is continually checked for tampering; no assumption need be made. Quantum crypto only helps me exchange a key