On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 05:30:33PM +0100, Erwann ABALEA wrote:
Please stop relaying FUD. You have full control over your PC, even if this
Please stop relaying pro-DRM pabulum. The only reason for Nagscab is
restricting the user's rights to his own files.
Of course there are other reasons for
On Wed, 2 Feb 2005, Dan Kaminsky wrote:
Uh, you *really* have no idea how much the black hat community is
looking forward to TCPA. For example, Office is going to have core
components running inside a protected environment totally immune to
antivirus.
How? TCPA is only a cryptographic
Daniel Carosone responded to me:
We develop TrustBar, a simple extension to FireFox ( Mozilla), that
displays the name and logo of SSL protected sites, as well as of the CA
(so users can notice the use of untrusted CA).
Other merits of the idea aside, if the user knows the CA is untrusted,
CALL FOR PARTICIPATION**
*
DIMACS Workshop on Theft in E-Commerce: Content, Identity, and Service
April 14 - 15, 2005
DIMACS Center, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ
Organizers:
Michael H. Warfield wrote
What Amir and Ahmad are looking at is
showing the CA as part of the trust equation
when the user hits a site. Some CAs will
enter the user's consciousness via normal
branding methods, and new ones will
trigger care caution. Which is what
we want - if something strange
On Feb 2, 2005, at 1:32 PM, bear wrote:
On Mon, 31 Jan 2005, Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
snip re: 3des broken?
[Moderator's note: The quick answer is no. The person who claims
otherwise is seriously misinformed. I'm sure others will chime
in. --Perry]
[snip]
When using CBC mode, one should not
