On Sun, 4 Jun 2006 16:52:38 -0500, Marcos el Ruptor
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://defectoscopy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=3
http://defectoscopy.com/results.html
and
http://defectoscopy.com/background.html
Are there any peer-reviewed descriptions of your technique? Right now,
all that
Isn't what you are referring to called secure number of rounds? In other
words the number of rounds after which no known attack exists that can break
the cipher faster than brute-forcing the key?
It looks like I have no choice but to invent a new term, PRF rounds - the
number of rounds
| ...This is the trusted-path problem. Some examples of proposed
| solutions to trusted-path are:
|
| - Dim the entire screen.
| - Use special window borders.
| - Use flashing window borders.
| - Use specially shaped windows.
| - Attach a warning label to all untrusted
Thomas Harold:
I do suspect at some point that the lightweight
nature of DNS will give way to a heavier, encrypted
or signed protocol. Economic factors will probably
be the driving force (online banking).
Thierry Moreau wrote:
E.g. RFC4033, RFC4034, RFC4035.
Well I wish it was going
Can you briefly explain how you determine the PRF rounds value?
William
Your question belongs in our forums -
http://defectoscopy.com/forum/viewforum.php?f=3 where it's already being
discussed.
Ruptor
[Moderator's note: no, actually, if you're going to mention it here,
you had better be
kent crispin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 01:47:06PM +1200, Peter Gutmann wrote:
Grab OpenVPN (which is what OpenSWAN should be), install, point it at the
target system, and you have opportunistic encryption.
Forgive my doltishness, but could you expand on that just a bit,
* Anne Lynn Wheeler:
Florian Weimer wrote:
FINREAD is really interesting. I've finally managed to browse the
specs, and it looks as if this platform can be used to build something
that is secure against compromised hosts. However, I fear that the
support costs are too high, and that's why
http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/06/04/1311243
--
((Udhay Shankar N)) ((udhay @ pobox.com)) ((www.digeratus.com))
-
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending unsubscribe cryptography to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Florian Weimer wrote:
You mean something like remote attestation? I find it hard to believe
that this capability is available today in a relatively open
environment, on a platform supporting multiple applications developed
by different applications.
re:
I do not understand why this course got so much attention. What is
special about it (besides available video lectures)?
I have a whole collection of links to similar courses. Please take a look at
http://www-cse.ucsd.edu/users/maxal/e-books.html
Just as an example, I can mention UCSD based
On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 01:57:25AM -0700, Udhay Shankar N wrote:
http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/06/04/1311243
It is taught by good people, but I find it a bit strange they are all
Microsoft employees. This is perhaps because U. Wash doesn't have any
cryptographers.
That changes in
11 matches
Mail list logo
