- Original Message -
From: "Andrea Pasquinucci" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Cryptography"
Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2007 12:33 PM
Subject: Re: Intuitive cryptography that's also practical and secure.
I have been working for
the last 2 years on a project about web-voting
(http://eballot.
On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 01:57:04PM +1300, Peter Gutmann wrote:
> Victor Duchovni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >What I don't understand is how the old (finally expired) root helps to
> >validate the new unexpired root, when a verifier has the old root and the
> >server presents the new root in
Allen wrote on 31.01.2007 01:02:
> I'll skip the rest of your excellent, and thought provoking post as it
> is future and I'm looking at now.
>
> From what you've written and other material I've read, it is clear that
> even if the horizon isn't as short as five years, it is certainly
> shorter tha
On Tue, 30 Jan 2007, Leichter, Jerry wrote:
> This is a common misconception. The legal system does not rely on
> lawyers, judges, members of Congress, and so on understanding how
> technology or science works. It doesn't rely on them coming to
> accept the trustworthiness of the technology on an
http://dwave.wordpress.com/2007/01/19/quantum-computing-demo-announcement/
--dan
-
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Alexander Klimov wrote:
[snip]
(Of course, with 60K passwords there is almost for sure at
least one "password1" or "Steven123" and thus the salts are
irrelevant.)
I'm not sure I understand this statement as I just calculated the
HMAC MD5 for "password1" using a salt of 7D00 (32,000 decim
John Gilmore forwards:
> http://news.com.com/IBM+donates+new+privacy+tool+to+open-source/2100-1029_3-6153625.html
>
> IBM donates new privacy tool to open-source
> By Joris Evers
> Staff Writer, CNET News.com
> Published: January 25, 2007, 9:00 PM PST
>
> IBM has developed software designed
