[Some interesting thinking going on. Wasn't there some similar ideas
presented/published at a past FC conference?]
Subject: [gsc] Digital cache with extended features
Date: Sun, 06 May 2007 12:57:08 +0300
From: George Hara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I
Phil Zimmermann is going in tonight (7 May) for heart bypass surgery.
He's not in immediate danger -- he's not having a heart attack, he's
not no in immediate danger, but they're pushing him into the hospital
quicker than any reasonable person would like. Obviously, that makes
for worries.
From: Shu-jen Chang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Public comments on the hash algorithm requirements and
evaluation criteria posted online Date: Tue, 08 May 2007 12:13:58 -0400
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1.1
FYI
Public comments on the hash algorithm requireme
> Well, there's an idea: use different physical media formats for
> entertainment and non-entertainment content (meaning, content created by
> MPAA members vs. not) and don't sell writable media nor devices capable
> of writing it for the former, not to the public, keeping very tight
> controls on
*
IEEE International Conference on Intelligence and Security Informatics 2007
May 23-24, 2007
Hyatt Hotel
New Brunswick, New Jersey
** DEADLINE FOR EARLY REGISTRATION IS ALMOST HERE **
Hosted by:
On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 05:13:44PM -0400, Leichter, Jerry wrote:
> Frankly, for SSH this isn't a very plausible attack, since it's not
> clear how you could force chosen plaintext into an SSH session between
> messages. A later paper suggested that SSL is more vulnerable:
> A browser plugin can in
On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 09:29:39AM -0600, Anne & Lynn Wheeler wrote:
> where there is possibly the suggestion that if the only thing being
> performed
> is authentication (and doesn't require either integrity and/or privacy) ...
> then possibly a totally different protocol by utilized (rather than
I was recently asked why not just deploy a Enterprise Right Management
solution instead of using various encryption tools to prevent data
leaks.
Any thoughts?
-
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe c
On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 01:13:36AM -0500, Travis H. wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 05:13:44PM -0400, Leichter, Jerry wrote:
> > Frankly, for SSH this isn't a very plausible attack, since it's not
> > clear how you could force chosen plaintext into an SSH session between
> > messages. A later pap
Travis H. wrote:
This reminds me a bit of a suggestion I once heard for protocol
designers that the messages of the various steps of the protocol
include a step number or something like it to prevent cut-and-paste
attacks (presumably each message has some redundancy to protect the
integrity/authe
On May 8, 2007, at 10:16 AM, Ali, Saqib wrote:
I was recently asked why not just deploy a Enterprise Right Management
solution instead of using various encryption tools to prevent data
leaks.
Any thoughts?
What problem are you trying to solve?
If you're dealing with a rights-management prob
On Wed, 9 May 2007 15:35:44 -0400
Thor Lancelot Simon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 01:13:36AM -0500, Travis H. wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 05:13:44PM -0400, Leichter, Jerry wrote:
> > > Frankly, for SSH this isn't a very plausible attack, since it's
> > > not clear h
| > > Frankly, for SSH this isn't a very plausible attack, since it's not
| > > clear how you could force chosen plaintext into an SSH session between
| > > messages. A later paper suggested that SSL is more vulnerable:
| > > A browser plugin can insert data into an SSL protected session, so
| > >
| > Frankly, for SSH this isn't a very plausible attack, since it's not
| > clear how you could force chosen plaintext into an SSH session between
| > messages. A later paper suggested that SSL is more vulnerable:
| > A browser plugin can insert data into an SSL protected session, so
| > might be
On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 07:57:18PM +1000, James A. Donald wrote:
> Assume Ann's secret key is a, and her public key is A = G^a mod P
>
> Assume Bob's secret key is b, and his public key is B = G^b mod P
>
> Bob wants to send Ann a message.
>
> Bob generates a secret random number x, and sends An
15 matches
Mail list logo
