On Jun 26, 2007, at 10:10 AM, Nicolas Williams wrote:
This too is a *fundamental* difference between QKD and classical
cryptography.
What does this classical word mean? Is it the Quantum way to say
real? I know we're in violent agreement, but why are we letting
them play language games?
I'm old enough to remember hearing (I've worked at BBN for a long
time now)
that connecting computers on a large scale just isn't going to work,
that
I would never need more than 4MB of main memory, etc. Any reader can
fill out the rest without my risking being pedantic.
I do remember
Jon Callas wrote:
On Jun 25, 2007, at 7:23 PM, Matt Johnston wrote:
On Mon, Jun 25, 2007 at 04:42:56PM +1200, David G. Koontz wrote:
Apple (mis)uses
TPM to unsuccessfully prevent OS X from running on non-Apple Hardware.
All Apple on Intel machines have TPM, that's what 6 percent of new
i'd also scrawled:
my understanding from a person active in the NEA working group [1] (IETF)
is that TPMs these days come along for free because they're included on-die
in at least one of said chips.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Check again. A few months ago I was chatting with someone who
Peter Gutmann writes:
Is anyone aware of a commercial product that implements
secret sharing? If so, can I get a pointer to some product
literature?
It's available as part of other products (e.g. nCipher do it
for keying their HSMs)
Do you mean the k of n operator cards? For those, I
http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?articleid=6670BF9B-E7F2-99DF-3EAC1C6DC382972F
A company is selling a window film that blocks most RF signals. The
obvious application is TEMPEST-shielding. I'm skeptical that it will
be very popular -- most sites won't want to give up Blackberry and cell
On 6/25/07, Greg Troxel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1) Do you believe the physics? (Most people who know physics seem to.)
For those who would like to know a little more about the physics, see:
http://www.icfo.es/images/publications/J05-055.pdf, Quantum Cloning,
Valerio Scarani, Sofyan
All your data belong to us. From Computerworld.
-- Jerry
Trusted Computing Group turns attention to storage
Chris Mellor
June 24, 2007 (TechWorld.com) The Trusted Computing Group has announced
a draft specification aimed at helping
As always, banks look for ways to shift the risk of fraud to someone -
anyone - else. The New Zealand banks have come up with some interesting
wrinkles oh this process. From Computerworld.
-- Jerry
NZ banks demand a peek at customer PCs
| http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?articleid=6670BF9B-E7F2-99DF-3EAC1C6DC382972F
|
| A company is selling a window film that blocks most RF signals. The
| obvious application is TEMPEST-shielding. I'm skeptical that it will
| be very popular -- most sites won't want to give up Blackberry and
|
[ This may well be OT; I leave that to the moderator. ]
Leichter, Jerry writes:
-+---
| As always, banks look for ways to shift the risk of
| fraud to someone - anyone - else. The New Zealand
| banks have come up with some interesting wrinkles on
| this process.
|
Peter Gutmann writes:
BitLocker just uses the TPM as a glorified USB key (sealing a key in a TPM is
functionally equivalent to encrypting it on a USB key). Since BitLocker isn't
tied to a TPM in any way (I'm sure Microsoft's managers could see which way
the wind was blowing when they designed
At 11:08 PM 6/26/2007, John Lowry wrote:
... Also, a small revolution has been taking place while
discussion (on this list anyway) has focused on 1st generation
QKD. Several very high speed (up to
nominal line speed) systems have been proposed. Long-haul all-
optical networks
are being
John Lowry [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The world of computing and communication sure looks different 40+
years later.
So I encourage you to look at QKD in context. I know everything is
moving in internet time but remember just how recently QKD has
been dragged off of the physics optics bench
| Leichter, Jerry writes:
| -+---
| | As always, banks look for ways to shift the risk of
| | fraud to someone - anyone - else. The New Zealand
| | banks have come up with some interesting wrinkles on
| | this process.
| |
|
| This is *not* a power play by banks, the
On Tue, Jun 26, 2007 at 02:03:29PM -0700, Jon Callas wrote:
On Jun 26, 2007, at 10:10 AM, Nicolas Williams wrote:
This too is a *fundamental* difference between QKD and classical
cryptography.
What does this classical word mean? Is it the Quantum way to say
real? I know we're in violent
16 matches
Mail list logo
