Re: voting by m of n digital signature?

* James A. Donald: > Is there a way of constructing a digital signature so > that the signature proves that at least m possessors of > secret keys corresponding to n public keys signed, for n > a dozen or less, without revealing how many more than m, > or which ones signed? What about this? Ch

Re: unintended?

On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 01:26:29PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > (snicker) from the local firefox > > > en-us.add-ons.mozilla.com:443 uses an invalid security certificate. > > The certificate is not trusted because the issuer certificate is not trusted. > > (Error code: sec_error_untru

Re: Bitcoin P2P e-cash paper

Hal Finney wrote: > I think it is necessary that nodes keep a separate > pending-transaction list associated with each candidate chain. > ... One might also ask ... how many candidate chains must > a given node keep track of at one time, on average? Fortunately, it's only necessary to keep a pe

WSJ Story on NSA history

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122660908325125509.html - The Cryptography Mailing List Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

unintended?

(snicker) from the local firefox en-us.add-ons.mozilla.com:443 uses an invalid security certificate. The certificate is not trusted because the issuer certificate is not trusted. (Error code: sec_error_untrusted_issuer) --bill --

NSA history

Here's a pointer to the new release http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB260/index.htm - The Cryptography Mailing List Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]