+ Fearghas McKay fm-li...@st-kilda.org:
http://www.itconsult.co.uk/stamper.htm
Has been around since ~1995 and just works whenever I have used it,
albeit some time ago. It publishes time stamp info on Usenet,
comp.security.pgp.announce which shows the last activity was in
2002...
If I may contribute a perspective to this discussion...
The issue of Trusted Time Stamping can be broken down into two main points:
1.) Why might trusted timestamping be important/useful; and,
2.) How can one do itreliably, scalability and securely (considering the
need for a forward-secure
-Original Message-
From: pgut001 [mailto:pgut...@wintermute01.cs.auckland.ac.nz]
On Behalf Of Peter Gutmann
Sent: October 5, 2009 10:07 PM
To: a...@poneyhot.org; cryptography@metzdowd.com
Subject: Re: Trusted timestamping
Alex Pankratov a...@poneyhot.org writes:
I have
http://lesswrong.com/lw/1ab/dying_outside/
Less Wrong
Dying Outside
59
HalFinney
05 October 2009 02:45AM
A man goes in to see his doctor, and after some tests, the doctor
says, I'm sorry, but you have a fatal disease.
Man: That's terrible! How long have I got?
Doctor: Ten.
Man: Ten? What
On 6 Oct 2009, at 14:48, Harald Hanche-Olsen wrote:
As explained at http://www.itconsult.co.uk/stamper/stampnew.htm they
moved to alt.security.pgp in 2002. But ... the latest timestamp
summary I can see there is from May 2009, so I guess the point stands,
unless it's just google groups that
