Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2003 14:00:59 -0400 (EDT)
From: Russell McOrmond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: General Copyright Discussions <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I have not had a chance to read this yet, but just referencing it in
case others did not notice it yet.
Date on file is Date modified: 2003/06/04
Jus
also sprach David Shaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.06.18.0240 +0200]:
> The problem is that the PKS keyserver was not written to handle keys
> with multiple subkeys.
[snip]
Thanks for the explanation. I didn't know about subkeys.pgp.net yet.
Moreover, I second the belief that the keyservers must b
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, John Young writes:
>
>Related: We have a three-year-old FOIA request to NSA for
>information on:
>
> The invention, discovery and development of "non-secret
> encryption" (NSE) and public key cryptography (PKC) by
> United Kingdom, United States, or any other
On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 03:47:01PM +0200, Stefan Kelm wrote:
> David,
>
> > A reasonable question would be "Why don't all the PKS operators
> > replace their server with SKS or something else?". I don't have a
> > good answer to that. It's certainly been asked.[3]
>
> ...and has been answered a
John Young wrote:
> James Ellis, GCHQ, in his account of the development of non-secret
> encryption credits a Bell Laboratories 1944 report on "Project
> C-43" for stimulating his conception:
However the concept seems familiar enough - unless I am missing something, a
PRNG (n for noise rather than
David,
> A reasonable question would be "Why don't all the PKS operators
> replace their server with SKS or something else?". I don't have a
> good answer to that. It's certainly been asked.[3]
...and has been answered a number of times. The thing is (and most people
seem to forget about this
John Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> James Ellis, GCHQ, in his account of the development of non-secret
> encryption credits a Bell Laboratories 1944 report on "Project
> C-43" for stimulating his conception:
>
>
> http://www.cesg.gov.uk/publications/media/nsecret/possnse.pdf
The URL above d
On Tue, 17 Jun 2003 23:42:13 +0200, martin f krafft said:
> an unusable public key. It only seems to work if they use modern
> software and obtain my key from keyserver.kjsl.com:11371 or the
You may also want to use subkeys.pgp.net. These are servers running
software not eating keys.
> - What i
Dear Colleagues,
One final reminder about the PODC early registration deadline, which
is TOMORROW, June 18. There is a link to the online registration on
the PODC 2003 webpage at:
http://www.podc.org/podc2003/
Also, the deadline to get the low conference rate at the hotel has been
extended
On Tue, 17 Jun 2003, Ian Grigg wrote:
> does anyone know how the easy way to secure a PHP website against
> session_fixation?
I noticed that the PHP documentation includes a new section on session
insecurity and a link to the paper on session fixation.
http://www.php.net/manual/en/ref.session.ph
James Ellis, GCHQ, in his account of the development of non-secret
encryption credits a Bell Laboratories 1944 report on "Project
C-43" for stimulating his conception:
http://www.cesg.gov.uk/publications/media/nsecret/possnse.pdf
The Possibility of Secure Non-Secret Digital Encryption
J. H.
On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 11:42:13PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> My key, 220BC883330C4A75, has multiple encryption subkeys, and it's
> about to get another one on Friday, as my current encryption key
> expires.
>
> A lot of people are reporting that they cannot encrypt to me, due to
> an unusabl
12 matches
Mail list logo
