Re: Attacking networks using DHCP, DNS - probably kills DNSSEC

2003-06-28 Thread Thor Lancelot Simon
On Sat, Jun 28, 2003 at 01:06:03PM -0700, Bill Stewart wrote: > Somebody did an interesting attack on a cable network's customers. > They cracked the cable company's DHCP server, got it to provide a > "Connection-specific DNS suffic" pointing to a machine they owned, > and also told it to use their

Attacking networks using DHCP, DNS - probably kills DNSSEC

2003-06-28 Thread Bill Stewart
Somebody did an interesting attack on a cable network's customers. They cracked the cable company's DHCP server, got it to provide a "Connection-specific DNS suffic" pointing to a machine they owned, and also told it to use their DNS server. This meant that when your machine wanted to look up yahoo

Apple DRM Revisited

2003-06-28 Thread R. A. Hettinga
Sci-Fi Hi-Fi: Weblog Sat, 17 May 2003 Apple DRM Revisited Posted: 20:54 | Category: [ /mac ] | Permanent Link: # In a previous post detailing my research into the iTunes Music Store's digital rights management scheme, I promised to c

Re: pubkeys for p and g

2003-06-28 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Nomen Nescio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.06.27.2230 +0200]: > Do you have a reference to what exactly Check Point says about this? > Maybe you are misunderstanding or misinterpreting them. If you could > quote it here verbatim (or provide a link if it is online) we might be > able to und

Re: Draft Edition of LibTomMath book

2003-06-28 Thread Peter Gutmann
Werner Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >Does the proprietary SSH still use GMP? I know no other major crypto apps >using GMP for big number math. I've seen it used in a couple of lesser-known apps that I played with for interop testing, nothing that counts as a major app though. Maybe it's b

Re: Feedback from the LibTomMath Book?

2003-06-28 Thread tom st denis
[Originally I was going to make this a private reply but since I have a cool explanation of Karatsuba I'll share it with the group] --- Anton Stiglic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I think it looks pretty good!. > > Here are some comments: > > On page 82 you mention Fourier Transform based solu