"R. A. Hettinga" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> At 12:35 PM -0400 5/27/04, John Kelsey wrote:
>>Does anyone know whether the low-power nature of wireless LANs protects
>>them from eavesdropping by satellite?
>
> It seems to me that you'd need a pretty big dish in orbit to get that kind
> of resolut
Ian Grigg wrote:
... fundamentally, as Steve suggests,
we expect email from anyone, and it's free.
We have to change one of those basic features
to stop spam. Either make it "non-free," or
make it "non-authorised." Hashcash doesn't
achieve either of those, although a similar
system such as a pa
At 12:35 PM -0400 5/27/04, John Kelsey wrote:
>Does anyone know whether the low-power nature of wireless LANs protects
>them from eavesdropping by satellite?
It seems to me that you'd need a pretty big dish in orbit to get that kind
of resolution.
The Keyholes(?) are for microwaves, right?
Cheer
"Udhay Shankar N" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Perry E. Metzger said:
>
>> Those of you who habitually post from an address other than the one
>> you are subscribed under can ask me to put you on a special list of
>> people who can post but are not subscribed.
>
> I sympathise. However, some non-
Perry E. Metzger said:
> Those of you who habitually post from an address other than the one
> you are subscribed under can ask me to put you on a special list of
> people who can post but are not subscribed.
I sympathise. However, some non-zero amount of the traffic on this
list is being sent t
