Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2004 21:34:20 -0400
From: Dave Emery [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: EZ Pass and the fast lane
No mention is made of encryption or challenge response
authentication but I guess that may or may not be part of the design
(one would think it had better
Reminder: following lots of discussion on this list, I wrote proposals
on how crypto can help solve phishing, spoofing and spamming problems.
Apparently few had problems downloading the PDF files from our (BIU)
site. so I've put both papers in ecrypt (which I believe is more
reliable), and
On Jul 3, 2004, at 14:22, Dave Howe wrote:
Well if nothing else, it is impossible for my bank to send me anything
I would believe via email now
To take this even slightly more on-topic - does anyone here have a
bank capable of authenticating themselves to you when they ring you?
I have had
At 10:40 AM 7/7/2004, Hal Finney wrote:
SET failed due to the complexity of distributing the software and setting
up the credentials. I think another reason was the go-fast atmosphere of
the late 90s, where no one wanted to slow down the growth of ecommerce.
The path of least resistance was
Security Theatre: From the man who made hundreds of
millions selling signatures on your keys:
--
It is your data, why do you have to pay a licence
fee for the application needed to access the data?
-- Mark Shuttleworth
http://www.tectonic.co.za/default.php?action=viewid=309topic=Open%20Source
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Gerck
Sent: 7 juillet 2004 14:46
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: identification + Re: authentication and authorization
I believe that a significant part of the problems discussed here is that
the three
Hi Ed and others,
Like usual, you present some very interesting ideas and thoughts. The
problem is that while we techies can discuss the identity theft definition
until we are blue in the face, the general public doesn't understand all the
fine subtleties. Witness the (quite amusing) TV ads by
At 10:40 AM 7/7/2004, Hal Finney wrote:
SET failed due to the complexity of distributing the software and setting
up the credentials. I think another reason was the go-fast atmosphere of
the late 90s, where no one wanted to slow down the growth of ecommerce.
The path of least resistance was
It would be relatively easy to catch someone
doing this - just cross-correlate with other
information (address of home and work) and
then photograph the car at the on-ramp.
Am I missing something?
It seems to me that EZ Pass spoofing should become as popular as
cellphone cloning, until they
John Gilmore wrote:
It would be relatively easy to catch someone
doing this - just cross-correlate with other
information (address of home and work) and
then photograph the car at the on-ramp.
Am I missing something?
It seems to me that EZ Pass spoofing should become as popular as
cellphone
[By the way, [EMAIL PROTECTED] is being left out of this conversation,
by his own configuration, because his site censors all emails from me. --gnu]
Well, I am presuming that ... the EZ Pass does have an account
number, right? And then, the car does have a licence place? So,
just correlate
Aram Perez wrote:
Hi Ed and others,
Like usual, you present some very interesting ideas and thoughts. The
problem is that while we techies can discuss the identity theft definition
until we are blue in the face, the general public doesn't understand all the
fine subtleties. Witness the (quite
12 matches
Mail list logo