At 9:29 AM -0700 10/28/04, James A. Donald wrote:
Is there a phone that is programmable enough to store secrets
on and sign and decrypt stuff?
I think we're getting there. We're going to need a, heh, killer ap, for it,
of course.
:-)
Cheers,
RAH
--
-
R. A. Hettinga mailto:
At 01:16 PM 10/28/04, you wrote:
MCI Inc. will offer secure two-way messaging through its SkyTel
Communications subsidiary next month, encrypting wireless text
with the Advanced Encryption Algorithm.
This service has been available to U.S. Government customers
for at least seven years, albeit
--- begin forwarded text
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 03:31:38 -0500 (CDT)
From: InfoSec News [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ISN] Secret Service busts online organized crime ring
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
List-Id: InfoSec News isn.attrition.org
List-Archive:
James A. Donald wrote:
R.A. Hettinga wrote:
[The mobile phone is] certainly getting to be like Chaum's
ideal crypto device. You own it, it has its own I/O, and it
never leaves your sight.
Is there a phone that is programmable enough to store secrets
on and sign and decrypt stuff?
At 10:29
AM 10/28/2004, James A. Donald wrote:
Is there a phone that is
programmable enough to store secrets
on and sign and decrypt stuff?
The ideal crypto device would be programmed by burning new
proms, thus enabling easy reprogramming, while making it
resistant to trojans and viruses.
IST Results - Adding reliability and trust to smartcards
http://istresults.cordis.lu/index.cfm/section/news/tpl/article/BrowsingType/Features/ID/70511
of course ... reliability and trust is more than just the smartcards ... it
assurance and trust related to the smartcard infrastructre ... not
Peter Fairbrother wrote:
Ben Laurie wrote:
OK, since my previous attempt to create a lower volume
ukcrypto-like-thing failed, I have concluded that the only way to handle
the problem is to produce a moderated version of ukcrypto. I know for
sure there's demand for this, but I also know that the
Ian Grigg wrote:
Alan Barrett wrote:
On Sat, 23 Oct 2004, Aaron Whitehouse wrote:
Oh, and make it small enough to fit in the pocket,
put a display *and* a keypad on it, and tell the
user not to lose it.
How much difference is there, practically, between this and using a
smartcard credit card in
http://www.vnunet.com/print/1159101
vnunet.com
Trio try for better mobile security
The Trusted Mobile Platform from Intel, IBM and NTT DoCoMo aims to make
mobiles a better bet for secure networking
Daniel Robinson, IT Week 01 Nov 2004
Intel, IBM and mobile communications company NTT DoCoMo
WASHINGTON (Reuters) -- The U.S. Air Force quietly has put into
service a new weapon designed to jam enemy satellite communications, a
significant step toward U.S. control of space.
http://www.cnn.com/2004/TECH/space/11/01/satellite.jamming.reut/index.html
Perry
DJ,
On Oct 13, 2004, at 10:59 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On the IEEE 802 standards track, CCM and GCM have traction. CCM has
been
in 802.11 for a while and the 802.16-2004 was published last week,
supplanting the broken DES-CBC mode with AES-CCM. For wireless
systems, we
know and like CCM and
Ben,
Ian Grigg wrote:
It should be obvious. But it's not. A few billions
of investment in smart cards says that it is anything
but obvious.
That assumes that the goal of smartcards is to increase security instead
of to decrease liability.
On whether the goal of smart cards is to reduce
12 matches
Mail list logo
