Simson Garfinkel analyses Skype - Open Society Institute

2005-01-28 Thread David Wagner
Adam Shostack [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 08:33:41PM -0800, David Wagner wrote: | In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you write: | Voice Over Internet Protocol and Skype Security | Is Skype secure? | | The answer appears to be, no one knows. The report accurately reports | that

Re: Simson Garfinkel analyses Skype - Open Society Institute

2005-01-28 Thread Adam Shostack
On Thu, Jan 27, 2005 at 03:22:09PM -0800, David Wagner wrote: | Adam Shostack [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 08:33:41PM -0800, David Wagner wrote: | | In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you write: | | Voice Over Internet Protocol and Skype Security | | Is Skype secure? | | | | The

DIMACS Workshop on Security of Web Services and E-Commerce

2005-01-28 Thread Linda Casals
***CFP DEADLINE EXTENDED to Friday, February 11, 2005*** *** DIMACS Workshop on Security of Web Services and E-Commerce May 5 - 6, 2005 DIMACS Center, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ Organizer: Brian

Re: Simson Garfinkel analyses Skype - Open Society Institute

2005-01-28 Thread Mark Allen Earnest
Adam Shostack wrote: I hate arguing by analogy, but: VOIP is a perfectly smooth system. It's lack of security features mean there isn't even a ridge to trip you up as you wiretap. Skype has some ridge. It may turn out that it's very very low, but its there. Even if that's just the addition of

Re: Simson Garfinkel analyses Skype - Open Society Institute

2005-01-28 Thread Florian Weimer
* David Wagner: I don't buy it. How do you know that Skype is more secure, let alone vastly more private? Maybe Skype is just as insecure as those other systems. For all we know, maybe Skype is doing the moral equivalent of encrypting with the all-zeros key, or using a repeating xor with a