Encryption Software Infers Guilt

2005-05-25 Thread Arash Partow

OK, the subject was a little exaggerated.

But in anycase feel free to read the following article:

http://news.com.com/Minnesota+court+takes+dim+view+of+encryption/2100-1030_3-5718978.html



Regards


Arash

Be one who knows what they don't know,
Instead of being one who knows not what they don't know,
Thinking they know everything about all things.
http://www.partow.net




-
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending unsubscribe cryptography to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Blair defends identity card plan

2005-05-25 Thread R.A. Hettinga
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/low/uk_news/politics/4577087.stm

The BBC

Wednesday, 25 May, 2005, 15:23 GMT 16:23 UK

Blair defends identity card plan

ID cards are needed to stop the soaring costs of identity theft, Prime
Minister Tony Blair has said as plans for a national scheme were
reintroduced.

The plan is for cards to be phased in from 2008, and made compulsory later.

The Tories will join Lib Dems and some Labour MPs to oppose cards unless it
is conclusively proved they are needed.

Critics say the cost of the scheme has already risen since November, and
say Mr Blair has cited ID theft as other reasons have failed to win backing.

Passport costs

The Home Office will not put a figure on the cost of setting up the scheme,
saying it is commercially sensitive.

But the scheme will cost an estimated £584m to run every year - a cost of
£93 per card, compared with an estimated cost of £85 per card in November.

Ministers stress they have not yet decided what fees people would have to
pay for the cards.

ID CARDS BILL INCLUDES:
*   Covers whole UK
*   Establishes national ID register
*   Powers to issue ID cards
*   Ensures checks can be made against other databases to cross 
check
people's ID
*   Lists safeguards on the sort of data that can be held
*   New criminal offence of possessing false ID documents
*   Provides a power to make it compulsory in the future to register
and be issued with an ID cards


Discounts would be available to some card holders but Home Office Minister
Tony McNulty refused to speculate whether other people would have to pay
more than £93.

He said the latest cost estimate was more robust than the figure given
last November.

And he argued that 70% of the cost would be spent on new biometric
passports whether or not ID cards were introduced.

New protections?

The latest Identity Cards Bill was published on Wednesday but it contains
only minor amendments to the plans which were dropped when the election
was called.

Changes include giving more responsibilities to the watchdog charged with
overseeing the scheme and new checks on which government agencies can
access ID card information.


Mr McNulty said: A secure compulsory national identity cards scheme will
help tackle illegal immigration, organised crime, ID fraud, terrorism and
will benefit all UK citizens.

The results of a trial involving 10,000 volunteers were also published.

It said most people enrolled successfully on all the different types of
biometric scheme.

But iris scan technology was less successful with black people and people
aged over 59, said the report.

Mr McNulty denied the scheme was discriminatory and stressed the trials
were not designed to test the technology.

Those who know far more than I suggest that the technology is moving in
the right direction, he said.

'Machismo'

Earlier, the prime minister's spokesman said the longer the debate had run,
the more people had seen the benefits of ID cards.

People are recognising that identity is just as valuable as possessions,
he said, suggesting it could take 60 hours to restore a stolen identity.

The Conservatives initially voted for the ID card legislation in the last
Parliament but abstained in the key Commons vote.

They say the plans had to pass five tests, including whether the technology
works.

The Lib Dems say they are opposed to the plans in principle but spokesman
Mark Oaten seized on the latest cost figures.

We have always argued this is a project that is going to run out of
control financially, he said.

Labour backbencher Neil Gerrard said opinion polls suggesting public
support for ID cards would change once people knew the costs and if the
scheme became compulsory.

Shami Chakrabarti, from civil rights group Liberty, urged MPs to reject
what she said was a rehashed bill that is more about political machismo
than rational policy.

The group says Mr Blair is focusing on identity theft after trying to
justify the cards on the grounds of tackling terrorism, illegal immigration
and organised crime.

-- 
-
R. A. Hettinga mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The Internet Bearer Underwriting Corporation http://www.ibuc.com/
44 Farquhar Street, Boston, MA 02131 USA
... however it may deserve respect for its usefulness and antiquity,
[predicting the end of the world] has not been found agreeable to
experience. -- Edward Gibbon, 'Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire'

-
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending unsubscribe cryptography to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Encryption Software Infers Guilt

2005-05-25 Thread James S. Tyre

The case itself is at
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=mnvol=apppub\0505\opa040381-0503invol=1

Finally, Schaub testified that, in a file entitled “research,” he 
found the text of Minn. Stat. § 617.246, which included “the definition of 
minor sexual performance, sexual conduct, things of that nature.”  He also 
testified that he found an encryption program, PGP, on appellant’s 
computer; PGP “can basically encrypt any file;” and, “other than the 
National Security Agency,” he was not aware of anyone who could break such 
an encryption.  But Schaub also admitted that the PGP program may be 
included on every Macintosh computer that comes out today, and appellant 
may have had the text of Minn. Stat. § 617.246 in his computer because of 
prior allegations against him.


...

Appellant first argues that he is entitled to a new trial because 
the district court erred in admitting irrelevant evidence of his internet 
usage and the existence of an encryption program on his computer.  Rulings 
involving the relevancy of evidence are generally left to the sound 
discretion of the district court.  State v. Swain, 269 N.W.2d 707, 714 
(Minn. 1978).  And rulings on relevancy will only be reversed when that 
discretion has been clearly abused.  Johnson v. Washington County, 518 
N.W.2d 594, 601 (Minn. 1994).  “The party claiming error has the burden of 
showing both the error and the prejudice.”  State v. Horning, 535 N.W.2d 
296, 298 (Minn. 1995).


Appellant argues that his “internet use had nothing to do with the 
issues in this case;” “there was no evidence that there was anything 
encrypted on the computer;” and that he “was prejudiced because the court 
specifically used this evidence in its findings of fact and in reaching its 
verdict.”  We are not persuaded by appellant’s arguments.  The record shows 
that appellant took a large number of pictures of S.M. with a digital 
camera, and that he would upload those pictures onto his computer soon 
after taking them.  We find that evidence of appellant’s internet use and 
the existence of an encryption program on his computer was at least 
somewhat relevant to the state’s case against him.  See Minn. R. Evid. 401.


At 11:07 PM 5/24/2005 -0700, Arash Partow wrote:


OK, the subject was a little exaggerated.

But in anycase feel free to read the following article:

http://news.com.com/Minnesota+court+takes+dim+view+of+encryption/2100-1030_3-5718978.html



Regards


Arash




James S. Tyre   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Law Offices of James S. Tyre  310-839-4114/310-839-4602(fax)
10736 Jefferson Blvd., #512   Culver City, CA 90230-4969
Co-founder, The Censorware Project http://censorware.net



-
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending unsubscribe cryptography to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: How secure is the ATA encrypted disk?

2005-05-25 Thread Dan Kaminsky
From what I've heard, datapath to the disk.  I've read enough of the
specs to see they're well aware a worm could brick a couple hundred
thousand hard drives.

--Dan


James A. Donald wrote:
Every ATA disk contains encryption firmware, though not 
all bioses allow you to use it.

There is a master and a user password, 32 bytes each. If 
you set them both to the same value, and that value is a 
strong 32 byte password, then the disk can only be 
booted or accessed by entering that password.

This disk firmware is what password protected laptops 
use.  It exists on most PCs, though most of them have no 
bios firmware to use it.

How strong is this standard - could someone bypass it by 
taking a soldering iron to the disk?  Is the disk
encrypted, or just the datapath to the disk? 
-
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending unsubscribe cryptography to [EMAIL PROTECTED]