I would think it would be safer to block the site, or provide a
warning dialog. (This is what I was expecting when I started reading
the head post; I was bit surprised at the interventionism to actually
go ahead and fix the site, maybe that would be a better default
behavior).
btw Regarding
Dare I say that the best must not be the enemy of the good?
--dan
-
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending unsubscribe cryptography to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 2005-09-20, Jerrold Leichter wrote:
One thing to consider is that an idiom like this solves an annoying problem.
Consider a linear search through an array:
for (i = 0; i lim; i++)
{ if (a[i] == target)
{ do something
break;
One issue I have not seen addressed in these contactless payment systems is
the needs of people who carry multiple payment instruments. A simple example
is a personal and a corporate credit card.
Cheers - Bill
-
Bill Frantz
| One thing to consider is that an idiom like this solves an annoying
problem.
| Consider a linear search through an array:
|
| for (i = 0; i lim; i++)
| { if (a[i] == target)
| { do something
| break;
| }
| }
|
On 9/20/05, Rich Salz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is wandering way far afield of the list charter. In an effort
to maintain some relevance, I'll point out that code reviews, and
crypto programming, are rarely done, and arguably shouldn't, by
programming wizards.
If by that you mean,
On 9/21/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Nick Owen) wrote:
Interesting question. I know that we can solve it on a
application-enabled cell phone with public keys - each service has only
swapped public keys so you can have any number. Can such a thing be
done on an RFID card too?
Bill Frantz wrote:
One
