Kevin Kretz writes:
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| > More people use just those three
| > than will *ever* vote.
| More people under 40, certainly. But in '04 there were 36 million
| people over 65, most of whom are eligible to vote. You know a lot of
| 70-year old e-gamblers or FaceBook
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
More people use just those three
than will *ever* vote.
More people under 40, certainly. But in '04 there were 36 million
people over 65, most of whom are eligible to vote. You know a lot of
70-year old e-gamblers or FaceBook members?
At 06:48 PM 12/18/2007 -0800, Arshad Noor wrote:
While there are many different ways to approach encryption
and decryption of sensitive data, you may want to consider
how you plan to manage the encryption keys before you go
down this path.
This is prudent. You should consider how to "securely"
The usual excuse, Dan: ignorance.
Those of us who know how companies maintain the security
of their systems minimize the use of, or eschew, such
sites. We also always ask for an Absentee (paper) ballot
in places where electronic voting is the only choice at
the polling booth.
Arshad Noor
Strong
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
May I point out that if voting systems have a level
of flaw that says only an idiot would use them, then
how can you explain electronic commerce, FaceBook,
or gambling sites? More people use just those three
than will *ever* vote.
The answer is NO, and that is so becau
John Denker writes:
|
| There is every reason to believe that the 2000 presidential
| election was stolen. A fair/honest/lawful election would
| have made Al Gore the 43rd president.
|
Let's not do this or we'll have to talk about JF Kennedy
who, at least, bought his votes with real money
May I point out that if voting systems have a level
of flaw that says only an idiot would use them, then
how can you explain electronic commerce, FaceBook,
or gambling sites? More people use just those three
than will *ever* vote.
--dan
--
On 12/23/2007 08:24 PM, ' =JeffH ' wrote:
> 2008: The year of hack the vote?
Shouldn't that be:
2008: Another year of hack the vote yet again?
..^^^...^
There is every reason to believe that the 2000 presidential
election was stolen. A fair/honest/lawful
