Here's a pointer to the new release
http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB260/index.htm
-
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending unsubscribe cryptography to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(snicker) from the local firefox
en-us.add-ons.mozilla.com:443 uses an invalid security certificate.
The certificate is not trusted because the issuer certificate is not trusted.
(Error code: sec_error_untrusted_issuer)
--bill
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122660908325125509.html
-
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending unsubscribe cryptography to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hal Finney wrote:
I think it is necessary that nodes keep a separate
pending-transaction list associated with each candidate chain.
... One might also ask ... how many candidate chains must
a given node keep track of at one time, on average?
Fortunately, it's only necessary to keep a
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 01:26:29PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(snicker) from the local firefox
en-us.add-ons.mozilla.com:443 uses an invalid security certificate.
The certificate is not trusted because the issuer certificate is not trusted.
(Error code:
* James A. Donald:
Is there a way of constructing a digital signature so
that the signature proves that at least m possessors of
secret keys corresponding to n public keys signed, for n
a dozen or less, without revealing how many more than m,
or which ones signed?
What about this?