On Tue, 30 Dec 2003, Eric S. Johansson wrote:
> But using your spam size, , the slowdown factor becomes roughly
> 73 times. So they would need 73 machines running full tilt all the time
> to regain their old throughput.
Believe me, the professionals have enough 0wned machines that this is
trivi
On Tue, 30 Dec 2003, Bill Stewart wrote:
> The reason it's partly a cryptographic problem is forgeries.
> Once everybody starts whitelisting, spammers are going to
> start forging headers to pretend to come from big mailing lists
> and popular machines and authors, so now you'll not only
> need to
