Re: [ISN] Oh Dan Geer, where art thou?
Ellen Messmer, in Network World, writes of Dan Geer: Whatever happens, don't expect this loose cannon of the Internet to go quietly into that dark night. So -- If those who raise obvious questions are "loose cannon," what then are the technologists who agreed with the report but chose not to sign? Victims? Pragmatists? Mercenaries? One hopes Ms. Messmer didn't really mean what she wrote... Will - The Cryptography Mailing List Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: yahoo to use public key technology for anti-spam
Steve Bellovin wrote: http://edition.cnn.com/2003/TECH/internet/12/05/spam.yahoo.reut/ Does anyone have details? How much overhead would this entail? And how, btw, should we feel about having to sign every message from our very own vanity domains? Will Rodger - The Cryptography Mailing List Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Reliance on Microsoft called risk to U.S. security
The report, written by many a crypto list member, is at: <http://www.ccianet.org/papers/cyberinsecurity.pdf> Will Rodger - The Cryptography Mailing List Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
