Zooko Wilcox-O'Hearn wrote:
[dropping tahoe-dev from Cc:]
On Thursday,2009-08-06, at 2:52 , Ben Laurie wrote:
Zooko Wilcox-O'Hearn wrote:
I don't think there is any basis to the claims that Cleversafe
makes that their erasure-coding (Information Dispersal)-based
system is
On Aug 6, 2009, at 1:52 AM, Ben Laurie wrote:
Zooko Wilcox-O'Hearn wrote:
I don't think there is any basis to the claims that Cleversafe makes
that their erasure-coding (Information Dispersal)-based system is
fundamentally safer, e.g. these claims from [3]: a malicious party
cannot recreate
[dropping tahoe-dev from Cc:]
On Thursday,2009-08-06, at 2:52 , Ben Laurie wrote:
Zooko Wilcox-O'Hearn wrote:
I don't think there is any basis to the claims that Cleversafe
makes that their erasure-coding (Information Dispersal)-based
system is fundamentally safer
...
Surely this is
[dropped tahoe-dev from Cc:]
On Thursday,2009-08-06, at 17:08 , james hughes wrote:
Until you reach the threshold, you do not have the information to
attack. It becomes information theoretic secure.
This is true for information-theoretically secure secret sharing, but
not true for
3. Cleversafe should really tone down the Fear Uncertainty and
Doubt about today's encryption being mincemeat for tomorrow's
cryptanalysts. It might turn out to be true, but if so it will be
due to cryptanalytic innovations more than due to Moore's Law. And
it might not turn out like
Zooko Wilcox-O'Hearn wrote:
I don't think there is any basis to the claims that Cleversafe makes
that their erasure-coding (Information Dispersal)-based system is
fundamentally safer, e.g. these claims from [3]: a malicious party
cannot recreate data from a slice, or two, or three, no matter
[cross-posted to tahoe-...@allmydata.org and cryptogra...@metzdowd.com]
Folks:
It doesn't look like I'm going to get time to write a long post about
this bundle of issues, comparing Cleversafe with Tahoe-LAFS (both use
erasure coding and encryption, and the encryption and key-management
Folks:
Over on the Tahoe-LAFS mailing list Brian Warner gave a typically
thoughtful, thorough, and precise analysis of cleversafe access
control as contrasted with Tahoe-LAFS access control. Brian
attempted to cross-post it to this list, but it bounced since he is
not a subscriber.
On Jul 24, 2009, at 9:33 PM, Zooko Wilcox-O'Hearn wrote:
[cross-posted to tahoe-...@allmydata.org and
cryptogra...@metzdowd.com]
Disclosure: Cleversafe is to some degree a competitor of my Tahoe-
LAFS project.
...
I am tempted to ignore this idea that they are pushing about
encryption
On Jul 26, 2009, at 12:11 AM, james hughes wrote:
On Jul 24, 2009, at 9:33 PM, Zooko Wilcox-O'Hearn wrote:
[cross-posted to tahoe-...@allmydata.org and cryptography@metzdowd.com
]
Disclosure: Cleversafe is to some degree a competitor of my Tahoe-
LAFS project.
...
I am tempted to ignore
10 matches
Mail list logo
