| Hey, quick question.
|
| If one wants to have multiple keys, but for ease-of-use considerations
| want to only have the user enter one, is there a preferred way to
| derive multiple keys that, while not independent, are "computationally
| independent"?
|
| I was thinking of hashing the passphra
Am Freitag 13 Oktober 2006 12:26 schrieb Thomas:
> Am Freitag 13 Oktober 2006 12:05 schrieb Travis H.:
> > On 10/13/06, Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Maybe RFC289.
> >
> > I assume you mean 2289, which appears to describe the OTP scheme used by
> > S/key.
>
> sorry, it was too early fo
Am Freitag 13 Oktober 2006 12:05 schrieb Travis H.:
> On 10/13/06, Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Maybe RFC289.
>
> I assume you mean 2289, which appears to describe the OTP scheme used by
> S/key.
sorry, it was too early for an copy-n-paste ;)
i meant:
B. Kaliski;
Am Dienstag 10 Oktober 2006 01:35 schrieb Travis H.:
> What is the accepted way to derive several keys from a user-supplied input?
Maybe RFC289.
AFAIK it also describes the reason why it protects against dictionary attacks.
Bye,
Thomas
--
Tom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
fingerprint = F055 43E5 1F3C 4F
