At Tue, 15 Jul 2008 18:33:10 -0400 (EDT),
Leichter, Jerry wrote:
For an interesting discussion of IPETEE, see:
www.educatedguesswork.org/moveabletype/archives/2008/07/ipetee.html
Brief summary: This is an initial discussion - the results of a
drinking session - that got leaked as an
On Jul 15, 2008, at 16:33 PM, Leichter, Jerry wrote:
The goal is
to use some form of opportunistic encryption to make as much
Internet traffic as possible encrypted as quickly as possible -
which puts all kinds of constraints on a solution,
Oh, then they should learn about Adam Langley's
For an interesting discussion of IPETEE, see:
www.educatedguesswork.org/moveabletype/archives/2008/07/ipetee.html
Brief summary: This is an initial discussion - the results of a
drinking session - that got leaked as an actual proposal. The
guys behind it are involved with The Pirate Bay. The
John Ioannidis wrote on 10 July 2008 18:03:
Eugen Leitl wrote:
In case somebody missed it,
http://www.tfr.org/wiki/index.php?title=Technical_Proposal_(IPETEE)
If this is a joke, I'm not getting it.
/ji
I thought the bit about Set $wgLogo to the URL path to your own logo
image was
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 05:08:39PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote:
It does sound a lot like SSL/TLS without certs, ie. SSL/TLSweakened to
make it vulnerable to MitM. Then again, if no Joe Punter ever knows the
difference between a real and spoofed cert, we're pretty much in the same
situation
At Thu, 10 Jul 2008 18:10:27 +0200,
Eugen Leitl wrote:
In case somebody missed it,
http://www.tfr.org/wiki/index.php?title=Technical_Proposal_(IPETEE)
I'm not sure what the status of http://postel.org/anonsec/
is, the mailing list traffic dried up a while back.
This is the first I
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 06:10:27PM +0200, Eugen Leitl wrote:
In case somebody missed it,
http://www.tfr.org/wiki/index.php?title=Technical_Proposal_(IPETEE)
I did miss it. Thanks for the link. I don't think in-band key exchange
is desirable here, but, you never know what will triumph in
Eugen == Eugen Leitl [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Eugen I'm not sure what the status of http://postel.org/anonsec/
The IETF just created a new list and subscribed all anonsec subscribers:
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/btns
-JimC
--
James Cloos [EMAIL PROTECTED] OpenPGP:
