>However, in some scenarios
>http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001h.html#61
>the common use of static data is so pervasive that an individual's
>information
>is found at thousands of institutions. The value of the information to the
>criminal is that the same information can be used to perpetrate fraud
At 07:23 AM 7/5/2004, Anton Stiglic wrote:
Identity has many meanings. In a typical dictionary you will find several
definitions for the word identity. When we are talking about information
systems, we usually talk about a digital identity, which has other meanings
as well. If you are in the fie
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Denker
Sent: 1 juillet 2004 14:27
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Ian Grigg
Subject: Re: authentication and authorization (was: Question on the state of
the security industry)
>1) For starters, "
At 12:26 PM 7/1/2004, John Denker wrote:
>The object of phishing is to perpetrate so-called "identity
>theft", so I must begin by objecting to that concept on two
>different grounds.
Subsequent posters have doubted the wisdom of quibbling with the term "identity
theft". I think the terminology
At 12:26 PM 7/1/2004, John Denker wrote:
The object of phishing is to perpetrate so-called "identity
theft", so I must begin by objecting to that concept on two
different grounds.
there are two sides of this some amount of crime statistics call it
ID-theft which plausibly could be either
Ian Grigg wrote:
The phishing thing has now reached the mainstream,
epidemic proportions that were feared and predicted
in this list over the last year or two.
OK.
> For the first
time we are facing a real, difficult security
problem. And the security experts have shot
their wad.
The object
