On Mon, 12 Dec 2005, Paul Hoffman wrote:
Or should we just stick to wikipedia? Is it doing a satisfactory job?
Also check out the Cryptography Reader:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiReader/Cryptography
Matt Crypto set up an article (to clean up) of the day replete with a bar
Travis H wrote:
Would a wiki specifically for crypto distribute the burden enough to
be useful? Or should we just stick to wikipedia? Is it doing a
satisfactory job?
The English Wikipedia's crypto coverage is a mixed bag. Out of the 800+
articles, there's a handful of fairly-good entries
Seems like a lot of new folks (myself included) ask questions that
have the following answer:
Read the literature, no there's no one site, that would be too much effort, c.
Would a wiki specifically for crypto distribute the burden enough to be useful?
Or should we just stick to wikipedia? Is
At 9:57 AM -0600 12/12/05, Travis H. wrote:
Would a wiki specifically for crypto distribute the burden enough to
be useful?
Or should we just stick to wikipedia? Is it doing a satisfactory job?
I cannot answer the first question: I am leery of wikis that have
open posting rights, and I am
On Mon, 12 Dec 2005, Travis H. wrote:
Seems like a lot of new folks (myself included) ask questions that
have the following answer: Read the literature, no there's no one
site, that would be too much effort, c. Would a wiki specifically
for crypto distribute the burden enough to be useful?
Travis H. wrote:
Would a wiki specifically for crypto distribute the burden enough to be useful?
Or should we just stick to wikipedia? Is it doing a satisfactory job?
I'd read it. More resources == better. But keep the current Wikipedia
controversy in mind WRT the veracity of the
