John Ioannidis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>Alex Alten wrote:
>> Great. What next? I guess air-gap transfer of flash memory might be
>> the best solution.
>>
>> Malware's new infection route: photo frames
>> http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2008/01/26/MNE7UHOOQ.DTL
>
>For start
Alex Alten wrote:
Great. What next? I guess air-gap transfer of flash memory might be
the best solution.
Malware's new infection route: photo frames
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2008/01/26/MNE7UHOOQ.DTL
For starters, you can turn off the "feature" that auto-runs cod
Great. What next? I guess air-gap transfer of flash memory might be the
best solution.
Malware's new infection route: photo frames
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2008/01/26/MNE7UHOOQ.DTL
- Alex
--
Alex Alten
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
