In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Trav
is H." writes:
>I recall reading somewhere that the NSA got ahold of some KGB numeric
>OTPs (in the standard five-digit groups). They found that they
>contained corrections, typos, and showed definite non-random
>characteristics. Specifically, they had a defi
- Original Message -
From: "Travis H." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: semi-preditcable OTPs
Despite [flawed OTPs], the NSA wasn't able to crack any messages.
My question is, why? I think I know the reason, and that is that any
predictability in a symbol of th
| I recall reading somewhere that the NSA got ahold of some KGB numeric
| OTPs (in the standard five-digit groups). They found that they
| contained corrections, typos, and showed definite non-random
| characteristics. Specifically, they had a definite left-hand
| right-hand alternation, and tend
I recall reading somewhere that the NSA got ahold of some KGB numeric
OTPs (in the standard five-digit groups). They found that they
contained corrections, typos, and showed definite non-random
characteristics. Specifically, they had a definite left-hand
right-hand alternation, and tended to not
