On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 10:28 AM, Brandon Enright wrote:
> "Steven M. Bellovin" wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 30 Apr 2009 17:44:53 -0700
>> Jon Callas wrote:
>>
>> > The accepted wisdom
>> > on 80-bit security (which includes SHA-1, 1024-bit RSA and DSA keys,
>> > and other things) is that it is to be ret
At 8:54 PM -0400 5/6/09, Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
>On Thu, 30 Apr 2009 17:44:53 -0700
>Jon Callas wrote:
>
>> The accepted wisdom
>> on 80-bit security (which includes SHA-1, 1024-bit RSA and DSA keys,
>> and other things) is that it is to be retired by the end of 2010.
>
>That's an interesting s
On Wed, 6 May 2009 20:54:34 -0400
"Steven M. Bellovin" wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Apr 2009 17:44:53 -0700
> Jon Callas wrote:
>
> > The accepted wisdom
> > on 80-bit security (which includes SHA-1, 1024-bit RSA and DSA keys,
> > and other things) is that it is to be retired by the end of 2010.
>
> T
On Thu, 30 Apr 2009 17:44:53 -0700
Jon Callas wrote:
> The accepted wisdom
> on 80-bit security (which includes SHA-1, 1024-bit RSA and DSA keys,
> and other things) is that it is to be retired by the end of 2010.
That's an interesting statement from a historical perspective -- is it
true? And
