of parallelism in the HW implementations.
Obviously, none of this is very relevant above layer 2.
Regards,
DJ
From: Ian Grigg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Oct 10, 2004 11:11 AM
To: Metzdowd Crypto [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: AES Modes
I'm looking for basic mode to encrypt blocks (using AES)
of about 1k
Quoting Brian Gladman [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Ian Grigg wrote:
Jack Lloyd also passed along lots of good comments I'd
like to forward (having gained permission) FTR. I've
edited them for brevity and pertinence.
[snip]
I'm obviously being naive here ... I had thought that the combined
Eric Young wrote:
Quoting Brian Gladman [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Ian Grigg wrote:
Jack Lloyd also passed along lots of good comments I'd
like to forward (having gained permission) FTR. I've
edited them for brevity and pertinence.
[snip]
I'm obviously being naive here ... I had thought that the
Ian Grigg wrote:
Jack Lloyd also passed along lots of good comments I'd
like to forward (having gained permission) FTR. I've
edited them for brevity and pertinence.
[snip]
I'm obviously being naive here ... I had thought that the combined
mode would
be faster, as it would run through the data
Jack Lloyd also passed along lots of good comments I'd
like to forward (having gained permission) FTR. I've
edited them for brevity and pertinence.
Jack Lloyd wrote:
If it's small messages, CCM would probably work pretty well. Personally I think
CCM is really poorly designed (in terms of easy
From: Ian Grigg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Oct 10, 2004 11:11 AM
To: Metzdowd Crypto [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: AES Modes
I'm looking for basic mode to encrypt blocks (using AES)
of about 1k in length, +/- an order of magnitude. Looking
at the above table (2nd link) there are oodles of proposed
Ian Grigg wrote:
Has anyone kept up to date with AES modes?
http://csrc.nist.gov/CryptoToolkit/modes
http://csrc.nist.gov/CryptoToolkit/modes/proposedmodes/
I'm looking for basic mode to encrypt blocks (using AES)
of about 1k in length, +/- an order of magnitude. Looking
at the above table (2nd
Zooko provided a bunch of useful comments in private mail,
which I've edited and forward for list consumption.
Zooko Wilcox-O'Hearn wrote:
EAX is in the same class as CCM. I think its slightly better. Also
there is GCM mode, which is perhaps a tiny bit faster, although maybe
not if you have to
