Re: FWD: [IP] Encrypting Bittorrent to take out traffic shapers

2006-02-09 Thread lorenzo
On 2/9/06, Dave Korn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Alexander Klimov wrote: > > On Tue, 7 Feb 2006, Adam Fields wrote: [...] > >> A side note is that they're using known insecure encryption methods > >> as a cpu tradeoff because it doesn't matter if the traffic is > >> decrypted eventually, as long a

Re: FWD: [IP] Encrypting Bittorrent to take out traffic shapers

2006-02-09 Thread Dave Korn
Alexander Klimov wrote: > On Tue, 7 Feb 2006, Adam Fields wrote: >> Over the past months more Bittorrent users noticed that their ISP is >> killing all Bittorrent traffic . ISP?s like Rogers are using bit- >> shaping applications to throttle the traffic that is generated by >> Bittorrent. >> A sid

Re: FWD: [IP] Encrypting Bittorrent to take out traffic shapers

2006-02-08 Thread Alexander Klimov
On Tue, 7 Feb 2006, Adam Fields wrote: > Over the past months more Bittorrent users noticed that their ISP is > killing all Bittorrent traffic . ISP?s like Rogers are using bit- > shaping applications to throttle the traffic that is generated by > Bittorrent. A better solution is to stop paying to

FWD: [IP] Encrypting Bittorrent to take out traffic shapers

2006-02-08 Thread Adam Fields
This item was posted to the IP list today about some efforts to add encryption to bittorrent for the sole purpose of disguising the traffic. A side note is that they're using known insecure encryption methods as a cpu tradeoff because it doesn't matter if the traffic is decrypted eventually, as lo