On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 1:47 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> Isn't this just a clarification of existing CALEA practice?
>
> In most jurisdictions, if a communications services provider is served
> an order to make available communications, it is required by law to
> provide it in the clear. Anything
On 9/28/2010 1:47 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
Essentially, officials want Congress to require all services that
enable communications — including encrypted e-mail transmitters like
BlackBerry, social networking Web sites like Facebook and software
that allows direct “peer to peer” mess
> Essentially, officials want Congress to require all services that
> enable communications — including encrypted e-mail transmitters like
> BlackBerry, social networking Web sites like Facebook and software
> that allows direct “peer to peer” messaging like Skype — to be
> technically ca
On 28/09/10 1:26 AM, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
> From the New York Times, word that the Obama administration wants to
> compel access to encrypted communications.
>
> http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/27/us/27wiretap.html
Someone should beat up the FBI for using specious arguments:
> But as an examp
[Moderator's note: there are messages still in the queue that will go
out later today, but I felt this had to go out ASAP --Perry]
From the New York Times, word that the Obama administration wants to
compel access to encrypted communications.
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/27/us/27wiretap.html
