Moin,
Am Tue, 15 Jan 2008 12:28:37 + schrieb Steven J. Murdoch:
There is some confusion on the cryptography mailing list over whether
the Crypto1 encryption algorithm which you reverse engineered is the
same as the Hitag 2 one. NXP don't help things by branding both as
Mifare.
* markus reichelt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Ralf-Philipp Weinmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My colleague Erik took photos of the slides which I put up on
Zooomr [0]. A video recording of the talk should be available
shortly and will be linked here.
preliminary link for the video:
The 48-bit Philips Hitag2 algorithm has been completely reverse-
engineered a long time ago:
http://cryptolib.com/ciphers/hitag2/
Ruptor
-
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending unsubscribe cryptography to
* Ralf-Philipp Weinmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My colleague Erik took photos of the slides which I put up on
Zooomr [0]. A video recording of the talk should be available
shortly and will be linked here.
preliminary link for the video:
From http://cryptanalysis.eu/blog/2007/12/29/mifare-crypto1:
MiFare’s CRYPTO1 stream cipher has captured my attention for a while.
However, hardware reverse-engineering is not a field I actively engage
in. So I was very happy when Karsten Nohl (University of Virginia),
Starbug and Henryk
