I've attached below Rick's reply to this thread. Rick Carback is a member of
the PunchScan team.
- Taral
-- Forwarded message --
From: Rick Carback
Date: Dec 16, 2007 12:01 PM
Subject: Re: Fwd: Fwd: PunchScan voting protocol
I think there are some misconceptions/assu
On 12/13/2007 08:23 PM, Taral wrote:
> On 12/12/07, John Denker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Several important steps in the process must be carried out in
>> secret, and if there is any leakage, there is unbounded potential
>> for vote-buying and voter coercion.
>
> I've done quite a bit of work
On 12/12/07, John Denker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Several important steps in the process must be carried out in
> secret, and if there is any leakage, there is unbounded potential
> for vote-buying and voter coercion.
I've done quite a bit of work with this protocol. The protocol assumes
the e
Hi Folks --
I was wondering to what extent the folks on this list have taken
a look the PunchScan voting scheme:
http://punchscan.org/
The site makes the following claims:
>> End-to-end cryptographic independent verification, or E2E, is a
>> mechanism built into an election that allows voter
