CORRECTION / RE: Qualified Certificate Request

2005-08-02 Thread Nap van Zuuren
algorithms, software used etc. Greetings, Nap -Original Message- From: Florian Weimer [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 22, 2005 7:42 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: cryptography@metzdowd.com Subject:Re: Qualified Certificate Request * Nap van Zuuren: Might

Re: Qualified Certificate Request

2005-07-25 Thread Florian Weimer
* Nap van Zuuren: Might be a nice (intellectual) crypto-exercise, but I am afraid that the concept of the Qualified Signature will not get a widespread implementation, expect for very specific areas/disciplines. That's by design, all those notaries public don't like being replaced by

Re: Qualified Certificate Request

2005-07-25 Thread Anne Lynn Wheeler
Nap van Zuuren wrote: Might be a nice (intellectual) crypto-exercise, but I am afraid that the concept of the Qualified Signature will not get a widespread implementation, expect for very specific areas/disciplines. The main problem with the Qualified Certificate (overhere in Europe) is

Qualified Certificate Request

2005-07-21 Thread Philipp Gühring
Hello, Peter Saint-Andre invited me here to present my concept of Qualified Certificate Requests to you. It is a long-term goal of CAcert to be able to provide qualified certificates. Regarding the requirements for qualified certificates, the only obstacle we still have is the problem, that

Re: Qualified Certificate Request

2005-07-21 Thread Anne Lynn Wheeler
Philipp Gühring wrote: Regarding the requirements for qualified certificates, the only obstacle we still have is the problem, that CAcert has to make sure, that the private key for the certificate is generated and stored securely in a SmartCard, or another Hardware Token. Since the users