Re: Quantum direct communication: secrecy without key distribution

2008-12-06 Thread Jim Youll
On Dec 5, 2008, at 7:06 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: well-placed but UNCORROBORATED informant sez that day before yesterday (3 dec): 5 hours of CheckFree traffic redirected and likely captured in full half of IP addresses for CheckFree left in place, half re-directed to Ukraine, i.e., partial

Re: Quantum direct communication: secrecy without key distribution

2008-12-06 Thread dan
> > The most obvious flaw is that when we're talking fiber optics the > eavesdropper might as well be a man in the middle, and so... well, see > the list archive. > ...possibly OT... well-placed but UNCORROBORATED informant sez that day before yesterday (3 dec): 5 hours of CheckFree tra

Re: Quantum direct communication: secrecy without key distribution

2008-12-05 Thread Nicolas Williams
[I'm guessing that nobody here wants yet another "quatum crypto is snake oil, no it's not, yes it is, though it has a bright future, no it's not, ..." thread.] On Fri, Dec 05, 2008 at 02:16:09PM +0100, Eugen Leitl wrote: >In the last couple of years, we've seen a number of quantum key >dis

Quantum direct communication: secrecy without key distribution

2008-12-05 Thread Eugen Leitl
From: the physics arXiv blog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: the physics arXiv blog To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2008 13:10:50 + [1]the physics arXiv blog [2]Quantum direct communication: secrecy without key distribution Posted: 04 Dec 2008 09:13 PM PST [3]quantum-