Re: Firm invites experts to punch holes in ballot software

2004-04-09 Thread Brian McGroarty
On Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 03:42:47PM -0400, Ian Grigg wrote: Trei, Peter wrote: Frankly, the whole online-verification step seems like an unneccesary complication. It seems to me that the requirement for after-the-vote verification (to prove your vote was counted) clashes rather directly

Re: Firm invites experts to punch holes in ballot software

2004-04-09 Thread Ian Grigg
Brian McGroarty wrote: On Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 03:42:47PM -0400, Ian Grigg wrote: It seems to me that the requirement for after-the-vote verification (to prove your vote was counted) clashes rather directly with the requirement to protect voters from coercion (I can't prove I voted in a

Re: Firm invites experts to punch holes in ballot software

2004-04-08 Thread Roland C. Dowdeswell
On 1081373018 seconds since the Beginning of the UNIX epoch Paul Zuefeldt wrote: Maybe the receipt should only allow the voter to check that his vote has been counted. To get the detail you could require him to appear in person with his receipt AND a photo ID or some such, then only allow him to

RE: Firm invites experts to punch holes in ballot software

2004-04-07 Thread Trei, Peter
Firm invites experts to punch holes in ballot software The company's software is designed to let voters verify that their ballots were properly handled. It assigns random identification numbers to ballots and candidates. After people vote, they get a receipt that shows which candidates they

Re: Firm invites experts to punch holes in ballot software

2004-04-07 Thread Ian Grigg
Trei, Peter wrote: Frankly, the whole online-verification step seems like an unneccesary complication. It seems to me that the requirement for after-the-vote verification (to prove your vote was counted) clashes rather directly with the requirement to protect voters from coercion (I can't prove

RE: Firm invites experts to punch holes in ballot software

2004-04-07 Thread Trei, Peter
Ian Grigg[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Trei, Peter wrote: Frankly, the whole online-verification step seems like an unneccesary complication. It seems to me that the requirement for after-the-vote verification (to prove your vote was counted) clashes rather directly with the

Re: Firm invites experts to punch holes in ballot software

2004-04-07 Thread Paul Zuefeldt
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 3:14 PM Subject: RE: Firm invites experts to punch holes in ballot software From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Trei, Peter Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 1:17 PM [SNIP