Re: TLS session resume concurrency?

2005-02-16 Thread Victor Duchovni
On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 11:31:16AM -0500, Tim Dierks wrote: On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 15:59:04 -0500, Victor Duchovni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If the symmetric cypher is fully re-keyed when sessions are resumed while avoiding the fresh start PKI overhead, then life is simple and sessions can be

TLS session resume concurrency?

2005-02-10 Thread Victor Duchovni
If multiple processes (or threads) have access to a shared TLS session cache, does the cache need N sessions to serve N threads? Or can (I think unlikely if sessions resume stream-ciphers from internal state in the cache) the same session be used by multiple clients? Postfix only has one TLS