Re: anonymous IP terminology (Re: [anonsec] Re: potential new IETF WG on anonymous IPSec (fwd from [EMAIL PROTECTED]))

2004-09-11 Thread Adam Back
On Sat, Sep 11, 2004 at 11:38:00AM -0700, Joe Touch wrote: > >>Although anonymous access is not the primary goal, it is a feature > >>of the solution. > > > >The access is _not_ anonymous. The originator's IP, ISP call traces, > >phone access records will be all over it and associated audit logs.

anonymous IP terminology (Re: [anonsec] Re: potential new IETF WG on anonymous IPSec (fwd from [EMAIL PROTECTED]))

2004-09-11 Thread Adam Back
Joe Touch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >The point has nothing to do with anonymity; > > The last one, agreed. But the primary assumption is that we can avoid a > lot of infrastructure and impediment to deployment by treating an > ongoing conversation as a reason to trust an endpoint, rather than