Re: voting by m of n digital signature?

2008-11-14 Thread Florian Weimer
* James A. Donald: Is there a way of constructing a digital signature so that the signature proves that at least m possessors of secret keys corresponding to n public keys signed, for n a dozen or less, without revealing how many more than m, or which ones signed? What about this?

Re: voting by m of n digital signature?

2008-11-10 Thread dan
James A. Donald writes: -+--- | Is there a way of constructing a digital signature so | that the signature proves that at least m possessors of | secret keys corresponding to n public keys signed, for n | a dozen or less, without revealing how many more than m, | or which

voting by m of n digital signature?

2008-11-09 Thread James A. Donald
Is there a way of constructing a digital signature so that the signature proves that at least m possessors of secret keys corresponding to n public keys signed, for n a dozen or less, without revealing how many more than m, or which ones signed?

Re: voting by m of n digital signature?

2008-11-09 Thread Richard Salz
Is there a way of constructing a digital signature so that the signature proves that at least m possessors of secret keys corresponding to n public keys signed, for n a dozen or less, without revealing how many more than m, or which ones signed? Yes there are a number of ways. Usually they