Nico Williams n...@cryptonector.com writes:
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 12:06 AM, Peter Gutmann
pgut...@cs.auckland.ac.nz wrote:
(The ASN.1 filter I mentioned earlier is a stripped-down version of dumpasn1.
Remember that dataset of 400K broken certs that NISCC generated a few years
ago and that
I wrote:
BER and DER are actually the safest encodings of the major security protocols
I work with.
Based on the following, which just appeared on another list:
In contrast to RFC 5280, X.509 does not require DER encoding. It only
requires that the signature is generated across a DER
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 7:07 AM, Peter Gutmann pgut...@cs.auckland.ac.nz wrote:
I wrote:
BER and DER are actually the safest encodings of the major security protocols
I work with.
Based on the following, which just appeared on another list:
In contrast to RFC 5280, X.509 does not require
On 2011-07-04, Jon Callas wrote:
Let me be blunt here. The state of software security is so immature
that worrying about crypto security or protocol security is like
debating the options between hardened steel and titanium, when the
thing holding the chain of links to the actual user
2011/7/6 lodewijk andré de la porte lodewijka...@gmail.com:
I find the phrasing very strange. You cannot destroy a bitcoin, only
render it practically beyond recovery. You could still recover it by
figuring out which account's full of money and brute forcing their private
key from their public
