"Matthijs R. Koot" writes:
>A low-complexity alternative to SSH seems useful and might perhaps allow
>validation by formal methods...
Funny you should mention that, I suggested this to someone recently because
it's something that's never been formally analysed and is likely an easy
target for
Hi Peter,
> I think there's a dual of this for people who've worked with security
> protocols. For example I've got a draft for a cut-down SSH that's probably
> about one tenth the complexity of the existing protocol while satisfying the
> majority of users (secure telnet/secure file transfer) th
"Zooko O'Whielacronx" writes:
>Hm, digging around in my keepsakes cabinet, I unfortunately do not find the
>original state transition diagram that I mentioned above, but I do find an
>artifact that I wrote a few months later=E2=80=94a sketch of a protocol that
>I called "ZRTP lite" which was ZRTP
