[cryptography] Gmail and SSL

2012-12-14 Thread Eugen Leitl
- Forwarded message from Randy na...@afxr.net - From: Randy na...@afxr.net Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 09:47:03 -0600 To: NANOG list na...@nanog.org Subject: Gmail and SSL User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 I'm hoping to reach out to

Re: [cryptography] Interactive graph of the CA ecosystem

2012-12-14 Thread Bernhard Amann
Hi, On Dec 14, 2012, at 4:25 AM, Ralph Holz h...@net.in.tum.de wrote: Root-CAs are pictured as red nodes, intermediate CAs are green. The node diameter scales logarithmically with the number of certificates signed by the node. Similarly, the color of the green nodes scales proportional to

Re: [cryptography] Interactive graph of the CA ecosystem

2012-12-14 Thread shawn wilson
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 11:10 AM, Bernhard Amann bernh...@icsi.berkeley.edu wrote: Hi, On Dec 14, 2012, at 4:25 AM, Ralph Holz h...@net.in.tum.de wrote: Root-CAs are pictured as red nodes, intermediate CAs are green. The node diameter scales logarithmically with the number of certificates

Re: [cryptography] Interactive graph of the CA ecosystem

2012-12-14 Thread Ralph Holz
Hi, To that end, have y'all thought of other views that would be interesting to have? Also, can you put more meta data along with the provider? Such as address, parent company, how long they've been a CA, (if it's known) how many certs they've signed? Certainly nice information. @Bernhard:

Re: [cryptography] London Hum Used to Timestamp Recordings

2012-12-14 Thread Taral
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 5:56 AM, mhey...@gmail.com mhey...@gmail.com wrote: I hope they kept that recording secret. Anybody can start recording now and then backdate things like recorded verbal agreements. I think you underestimate the difficulty of *removing* hum from a recording. -- Taral

Re: [cryptography] Gmail and SSL

2012-12-14 Thread Jeffrey Walton
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 10:51 AM, Eugen Leitl eu...@leitl.org wrote: - Forwarded message from Randy na...@afxr.net - From: Randy na...@afxr.net Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 09:47:03 -0600 To: NANOG list na...@nanog.org Subject: Gmail and SSL User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64;

Re: [cryptography] Gmail and SSL

2012-12-14 Thread James A. Donald
On 2012-12-15 1:51 AM, Eugen Leitl wrote: - Forwarded message from Randy na...@afxr.net - From: Randy na...@afxr.net Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 09:47:03 -0600 To: NANOG list na...@nanog.org Subject: Gmail and SSL User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0

Re: [cryptography] Gmail and SSL

2012-12-14 Thread John Levine
I don't have hundreds of dollars to get my ssl certificates signed, ... I don't have a strong opinion either way about Gmail's new signing requirement, but if the issue is money, Startcom's free certs seem to satisfy Gmail. Once you set up an account, it takes about five minutes to get a cert