Re: [cryptography] a Cypherpunks comeback

2013-07-22 Thread Adam Back
Could you please get another domain name, that name is just ridiculous. It might tickle your humour but I guarantee it does not 99% of potential subscribers... Unless your hidden objective is to drive away potential subscribers. Adam On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 11:07:26AM +0200, Eugen Leitl

Re: [cryptography] a Cypherpunks comeback

2013-07-22 Thread Eugen Leitl
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 09:41:14AM +0200, Adam Back wrote: Could you please get another domain name, that name is just ridiculous. It might tickle your humour but I guarantee it does not 99% of potential subscribers... Unless your hidden objective is to drive away potential subscribers.

Re: [cryptography] a Cypherpunks comeback

2013-07-22 Thread grarpamp
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 3:41 AM, Adam Back a...@cypherspace.org wrote: Could you please get another domain name, that name is just ridiculous. It might tickle your humour but I guarantee it does not 99% of potential subscribers... Unless your hidden objective is to drive away potential

Re: [cryptography] Must have seemed like a good idea at the time

2013-07-22 Thread Florian Weimer
* James A. Donald: This not all that fatal, as the money is traceable, but it means that the financial institution needs an apparatus to reverse cell phone transactions, and that cell phone money is therefore soft on the may scale. This has been the case for giro payments for a while, and

Re: [cryptography] Cypherpunks

2013-07-22 Thread Tony Arcieri
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 8:18 PM, Sean Beck seanmckayb...@lavabit.comwrote: Does it look encrypted? Encrypted with a virus -- Tony Arcieri ___ cryptography mailing list cryptography@randombit.net