On Sep 13, 2013, at 8:10 AM, Adam Back a...@cypherspace.org wrote:
“In the 1960s students at MIT protested strongly against having a
classified research laboratory on the campus and MIT said we will divest
it, so it won’t be part of MIT anymore,” said Leslie. “It still exists in
Cambridge,
Quote, Personally, I don't feel that the threat justifies what has been
donesnip
Your feeling is supported by data.
http://www.johnstonsarchive.net/terrorism/wrjp255a.html
The above link is a formatted list of total deaths by terrorism (in the USA)
dating back to 1865.
You are 17,600
On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 7:08 PM, Jeffrey Goldberg jeff...@goldmark.org wrote:
On 2013-09-13, at 9:28 AM, David D da...@7tele.com wrote:
...
Obviously, we should insist on due process for the NSA stooges. If they
confess their activities and name their co-conspirators, we may allow them
some
Great points all around. Your suggestions for identification and punishment
are delightful.
Does it do enough? That is up to the person holding the flaming torch
leading the angry mob.
I commend your vivid imagination and magical abilities to reduce an entire
email down to one point and run
On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 4:49 PM, David D da...@7tele.com wrote:
Great points all around. Your suggestions for identification and punishment
are delightful.
someone mentioned a bitcoin assassination pool:
names to addresses,
addresses to kill bid,
according to harm perpetuated.
if your
2.17BTC ($267USD) pledged to the SHA1 reward to date.
It's amusing that the Bitcoin scripting language lets you pull off
stunts like this; annoying that the scripting language is too limited to
pull off much more than this. In any case I'd love to see proof of a
SHA1 or RIPEMD160 collision
On 09/15/2013 03:12 AM, Peter Todd wrote:
It's amusing that the Bitcoin scripting language lets you pull off
stunts like this; annoying that the scripting language is too limited to
pull off much more than this.
You have seen the CoinWitness proposal?
