W dniu 28.05.2014 22:35, Sadiq Saif pisze:
http://truecrypt.sourceforge.net/
https://gist.github.com/anonymous/e5791d5703325b9cf6d1
https://twitter.com/matthew_d_green
So WTF happened?
The same thing that happened with Lavabit.
--
Lukasz Biegaj
___
On 5/28/2014 4:35 PM, Sadiq Saif wrote:
http://truecrypt.sourceforge.net/
https://gist.github.com/anonymous/e5791d5703325b9cf6d1
https://twitter.com/matthew_d_green
So WTF happened?
So encrypt with BitLocker and decrypt with TrueCrypt? Why?
--
Kevin
On 5/28/2014 17:04, Kyle Maxwell wrote:
> Sabu told me over lunch that Snowden revealed the NSA compromise of
> TrueCrypt while having lunch with Putin in Crimea.
>
Good one.
--
Sadiq Saif
___
cryptography mailing list
cryptography@randombit.net
http:
Sabu told me over lunch that Snowden revealed the NSA compromise of
TrueCrypt while having lunch with Putin in Crimea.
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 4:02 PM, Swair Mehta wrote:
> 1) Microsoft ended support for XP.
> 2) Elcomsoft claims the ability to retrieve master & secondary (XTS mode)
> keys for Tr
1) Microsoft ended support for XP.
2) Elcomsoft claims the ability to retrieve master & secondary (XTS mode)
keys for TrueCrypt volumes/partitions from hibernation files.
3) Passware same as above.
4)
https://opencryptoaudit.org/reports/iSec_Final_Open_Crypto_Audit_Project_TrueCrypt_Security_Assess
http://truecrypt.sourceforge.net/
https://gist.github.com/anonymous/e5791d5703325b9cf6d1
https://twitter.com/matthew_d_green
So WTF happened?
--
Sadiq Saif
___
cryptography mailing list
cryptography@randombit.net
http://lists.randombit.net/mailman/list
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 3:24 AM, Michael Rogers
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On 28/05/14 10:54, Mansour Moufid wrote:
>> On Fri, 2014-04-25 at 09:28 -0700, Tony Arcieri wrote:
>>
>>> There's an entire class of memory safety bugs which are possible
>>> in C but not
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 28/05/14 10:54, Mansour Moufid wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-04-25 at 09:28 -0700, Tony Arcieri wrote:
>
>> There's an entire class of memory safety bugs which are possible
>> in C but not possible in Rust. These also happen to be the class
>> of bugs th
On Fri, 2014-04-25 at 09:28 -0700, Tony Arcieri wrote:
> There's an entire class of memory safety bugs which are possible in C but
> not possible in Rust. These also happen to be the class of bugs that lead
> to Heartbleed-like secret leakage or remote code execution vulnerabilities.
It seems we'
