I added a comment on your Stack Overflow post (incorrectly closed, IMHO,
but the SO crowd can be prickly).
The right thing to do depends on knowing a couple more details:
1. Where are you getting your certificates?
2. What's the best way to name the servers you trust?
Since you have a proprieta
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 5:27 PM, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Is anyone aware of any progress (convictions?) in Ulf Möller's murder?
>
> http://ulf-m.blogspot.com was last updated in February, 2012, and only
> talks of the "arrest for robbing and killing Ulf and for other
> crimes." Arrest
On Sep 19, 2012, at 4:48 PM, "mhey...@gmail.com" wrote:
> Every three months I, the Grantor, encrypt my secret in a new
> secret-encrypting-key and place that secret in my box. (I keep my box
> away from others - maybe put it in a safe).
>
> I also encrypt that secret-encrypting key in a public ke
This is an interesting paper that presumably has implications for other
social engineering schemes beside financial scammers:
http://research.microsoft.com/pubs/167719/WhyFromNigeria.pdf
ABSTRACT
False positives cause many promising detection technologies to be
unworkable in practice. Attackers, w
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 2:51 PM, Matthew Green wrote:
> I think that Jack said most of what I would. The incentives all point in
> the wrong direction.
>
While this is all true, it's also why manufacturers who want persuasive
analysis of their products hire consulting vendors with a brand and tra
An interesting item in the historical record, even if it's not actually a
code (this is my understanding of the current best hypothesis):
http://beinecke.library.yale.edu/digitallibrary/voynich.html
- Tim
___
cryptography mailing list
cryptography@rando
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 10:37 PM, <
travis+ml-rbcryptogra...@subspacefield.org
> wrote:
> > 4. You can now construct an encryption algorithm which encrypts within
> this
> > set. Alternatives include:
>
> Ah, I hadn't considered the re-hashing until it fell within range.
>
> But why do I not see
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 9:31 PM,
> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 12:49:26PM +1100, Noon Silk wrote:
> > Sounds to me like the simplist solution is just a one-time pad[1]. It
> > won't increase the size, and from the sounds of your environment, you
> > can just keep the keys locally, and use th
